Wednesday, September 30, 2009
15 Ways to Boost Your Memory in Your 30s, 40s, 50s, and Beyond - Healthy Living - Health.com
Shared via AddThis
Monday, September 21, 2009
Butter vs. Margarine – What’s the Truth?
Why butter is good for you:
The proponents (and manufacturers) of margarine have spread the word that butter is a saturated fat and saturated fat causes heart disease. I don’t have the space here to get into the details, but let me say this – there are many doctors, nutritionists, and scientists who do not believe this, including myself. If you want to learn how this theory became the accepted norm despite those who do not agree I’d encourage you to read Gary Taubes’ Good Calories Bad Calories, Dr. Uffe Ravnskov’s The Cholesterol Myths, or visit the Weston Price Foundation web site www.westonaprice.org.
That being said, there is a general consensus that we need some saturated fat in our diet. Butter is a healthy saturated fat, particularly when it is organic, and even better when it comes from a grass fed cow. It is high in the fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K. Without proper vitamins we can not utilize the minerals we ingest, no matter what level we eat. Vitamins A & D are essential for growth, healthy bones, proper development of the brain and nervous systems, and for normal sexual development. Vitamin E is an antioxidant and vitamin K is important for bone building and blood clotting.
Butter also has CLA (conjugated linolenic acid) that helps fight weight gain and butyric acid which is anti-viral and anti-cancer. For those with an allergy to the dairy protein casein, ghee (clarified butter) is an equally healthy option.
Why margarine is bad for you:
What may get lost in the discussion of whether or not butter is good for you, is the fact that margarine is definitely harmful to you. The bottom line is that margarine is made with hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oil. That means trans-fats. One fact that everyone who talks about nutrition agrees on is that trans fats cause cancer. (The other fact is that sugar is bad for you.)
A major problem we run into is that food labeling, particularly trans fat labeling is very deceiving. Basically, food manufacturers abuse the FDA labeling rules. According to FDA guidelines if products have less than 0.5g of trans fat per serving it can be labeled as zero grams of trans fat. The typical serving size is one tablespoon – that’s not all that much. One manufacturer, Smart Balance, has created an advertisement to show it has the least amount of trans fats compared to other brands. They conclude that of all the leading brands theirs stands out as it is “the closest to zero grams trans fat nature allows.” Quite the statement. They admit there is trans fat; trans fat causes cancer; but hey, it is as close as we can come. Sounds like a cigarette company telling us to smoke just one cigarette each day, because that is as close to zero as you could come!
Another basic problem with margarine is that it is made from a variety of vegetable oils which are polyunsaturated fatty acids. When exposed to heat and oxygen – both during manufacturing and later in cooking at high temperature – “free radicals” are created. These are the villains that damage our cells and tissues causing cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Our body knows the truth:
A summary of the biological facts concerning saturated fats and trans fats: saturated fats are essential for healthy cell membrane function, trans fats interfere with it; saturated fats enhance hormone production, trans fats interfere with it; saturated fats suppress inflammation, trans fats encourage inflammation; saturated fats raise “good” cholesterol, trans fats lower “good” cholesterol; saturated fats help insulin receptors, trans fats inhibit them; saturated fats enhance the immune system, trans fats depress it. So as you can see, from a biological perspective we need saturated fats and not trans fats.
Bernard Rosen, PhD is a Nutrition Consultant and Educator. He works with individuals, groups, and at corporations to create individualized nutrition and wellness programs. His office is in Thiensville. To learn more or to schedule an appointment, e-mail at bernie@brwellness.com, call (262) 389-9907 or go to www.brwellness.com.
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Lifestyle Changes Decrease Breast Cancer
The American Institute for Cancer Research/World Cancer Research Fund estimate that 40% of all breast cancers - over 70,000 breast cancer cases in the United States every year - could be avoided with simple lifestyle changes.1. Because of the link between excess body fat and cancer aiming to be as lean as possible without becoming underweight.
2. Physical activity for at least 30 minutes every day
3. If you drink alcohol at all, limit consumption to one drink per day.
4. Mothers should breastfeed exclusively for up to six months and then add other liquids and foods. Evidence is convincing that mothers who breastfeed reduce their risk for breast cancer. There is also probable evidence that children who are breastfed have a lower risk of gaining excess weight as they grow.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
The Kase for Vitamin K (and another reason to avoid Splenda)
And now here’s the big “ah-hah” moment! We’ve all heard how our use of antibiotics kills the friendly flora, well here’s another. When experimental animals were given “FDA acceptable daily intake” amounts of sucralose (that’s Splenda) for 12 weeks, numbers of key beneficial flora were decreased significantly. Even after another 12 weeks of being off sucralose key levels remained significantly depressed. (Information courtesy of Nutrition & Healing September 2009 newsletter by Dr. Jonathan Wright.)
So – if you are having digestive problems and can’t figure out why, Splenda may be the culprit. And to be honest, any time you have something you can’t figure out, lay off all the artificial sweeteners for about 45 days and see what happens. They’ve been connected to all kinds of health maladies.
Bernard Rosen, PhD is a Nutrition Consultant and Educator. He works with individuals, groups, and at corporations to create individualized nutrition and wellness programs. His office is in Thiensville, WI. To learn more or to schedule an appointment, e-mail at bernie@brwellness.com, call (262) 389-9907 or go to www.brwellness.com.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Back to School Nutrition Ideas
The consumption of “kid’s food” and more sedentary lifestyles (lack of exercise, lots of television, computer, and video games) is greatly impacting the health of our youth. Here’s some scary statistics from the CDC. Obesity among children aged 6 to 11 more than doubled in the past 25 years, increasing from 6.5% in 1980 to 17.0% in 2006. The rate among adolescents aged 12 to 19 more than tripled, going from 5% to almost 18%. Keep in mind, before being classified as “obese” there is “overweight” classification, which I have seen estimates between 20 and 25%.
How do we get our kids to eat healthier foods? One successful strategy that I use is to make subtle substitutions to the foods they like to eat. Let’s take something as simple as the peanut butter and jelly sandwich. For the peanut butter use organic peanut butter that is nothing but peanuts and peanut oil. Most commercial peanut butters contain added sugar and hydrogenated oil (trans- fats). We know trans-fats are linked to cancer and that added sugar adds empty calories. I stress the organic because peanuts are one of the most highly pesticided crops, so non-organic peanut butter will contain potential chemical residues and toxins. Ever wonder why there are so many peanut allergies today? For the bread I recommend sprouted bread. It comes in a variety of flavors and is the healthiest bread option. It has more vitamins and fewer calories per slice. However, it is made from wheat so for those with gluten intolerance use another bread option such as flax and millet bread. For the jelly, find the most natural product you can. Look for spreads that do not add sugar or have less sugar added. The fruit already has plenty of sugar.
What are some other healthy substitutions? A major area to look at is the carbohydrates. Our kids eat a lot of them – bread, rice, pasta. Our goal here is to shift from the refined and processed white flour products to whole grains. In addition to the switch to sprouted breads, we can use brown rice instead of white rice and pasta from brown rice rather than refined wheat (the white pasta). All of these substitutions taste virtually the same. They just look a little different and that may turn off the kids. But, covered in tomato sauce they will never know the difference!
Then there are snacks. The kids get home from school and they are hungry and it is not quite dinner time. There are certainly some better choices than chips and dips. Another societal norm is this idea of “snack food.” Just like with “kid’s food” we need a little retraining. What is a snack? It is a small meal. So, think of something healthy that would be part of a meal. It can be a half of a sandwich, one hard boiled egg, a cup of yogurt, some fruit, something spread on a stick of celery, vegetables and dip. There’s nothing special about these foods, except that they are healthy. I like to tell people not to worry about if something is considered “breakfast” food or “snack” food – just eat healthy food when you are hungry!
A valuable resource is the web site www.mequonkids.com. It has lots of great ideas for school lunches and snacks. For more ideas and recipes go to the mequonkids.com web site and click on “Brown Bag Lunch Ideas” or “After School Snacks.”
Bernard Rosen, PhD is a Nutrition Consultant and Educator. He works with individuals, groups, and at corporations to create individualized nutrition and wellness programs. His office is in Thiensville. To learn more or to schedule an appointment, e-mail at bernie@brwellness.com, call (262) 389-9907 or go to www.brwellness.com.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Things I've learned today
Geocaching several caches in one day is stupid for us.
The geocaches that say bring your own pen are so samll that it doesn't have any fun trading items to keep the kids interested.
Apparently, my kids would love to live in a pickle barrell.
A day trip for our family usually lasts ALL day with lots of side trips. Its 9:57 and we're 1/2 hour from camp (strike that.....its now 10:45 and according to TomTom we won't be back at camp until midnight) .
However we see a lot of things that most people never see in their lifetime.
The UP has some gorgeous uninhabited country.
Which is a REALLY good thing considering that Chuck drove off and left me standing in a backcountry road with no pants on as I changed out of my swim bottoms and into pants.
Nylon swim bottoms are NOT comfortable to walk in all day long and the resulting rash is less comfortable.
Driving off the beaten track and into some primitive campgrounds of the NPS make me miss our tent camping days of Chuck and I.
However, driving back in the still of the night with sleeping children makes for some awesome quiet couple time.
And I'm going to enjoy it.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Bioidentical Hormones
Hormone therapy is a frequent topic of discussion with my patients. The media coverage of bioidentical hormones including Oprah, Suzanne Somers and Dr. Christiane Northrup have empowered women to seek a better quality of life and relief from menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, night sweats, impaired sleep, vaginal dryness, decreased libido, painful intercourse, loss of memory and weight gain. This has caused quite a stir in the medical community. Why? Because women are asking questions they’ve not asked before – especially about bioidentical hormones. What are bioidentical hormones? Bioidentical hormones are prescribed hormones that are identical to the hormones produced in a women’s body prior to the onset of menopause. The most commonly prescribed include three different types of estrogen (estrone, estradiol and estriol), progesterone, testosterone and dehydroepiandosterone (DHEA).
There are two categories of bioidentical hormones: compounded and manufactured.
Compounded bioidentical hormones are pills, creams, gels, suppositories, injectables, sublingual drops or lozenges that are prescribed by health care providers who tailor the dose to a woman’s individual symptoms and concerns. They are literally assembled in the pharmacy by a certified compounding pharmacist and are available through mail-order and some local pharmacies. Compounded bioidentical hormones are generally not covered by insurance and therefore are an out-of-pocket expense.
Manufactured bioidentical hormones are pills, creams, gels, sprays and injectable medications manufactured and marketed by large pharmaceutical companies. They come in standard doses and, therefore, are not available as tailor-made medications. There are other limitations with manufactured hormones. For instance, bioidentical estrogen is only manufactured as estradiol – the most potent of the three types manufactured in a woman’s body. Manufactured bioidentical hormones may be covered by insurance.
The alternative to bioidentical hormone therapy is synthetic hormone therapy. They include manufactured hormones that are similar to but intentionally different than the chemical structure as those hormones produced in a woman’s body. Premarin (conjugated equine estrogen) and Provera (a synthetic progestin) are the most commonly prescribed conventional hormones. They are the suspect hormones studied in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Study that raised concerns about all hormone replacement therapy due to increased risks of blood clot formation, stroke, heart attack and cancer. Upon release of this information in 2002, many women abruptly stopped hormone usage and many physicians stopped or significantly limited prescribing hormone therapy.
The American
The debate in the medical community continues regarding the safety and effectiveness of the bioidentical hormones as they have not been studied in large standardized controlled trials such as the WHI. However, it is difficult to undertake such studies when medications are tailor-made for individual women. Small European studies from the 1980’s suggest an improved safety profile with bioidentical hormones. However, this has yet to be proven.
A review article published in January of 2009 in the Journal of Postgraduate Medicine states that patients report greater satisfaction with bio-identical hormone therapies. Clinical outcomes and physiologic data support that bio-identical hormones are more effective than synthetic hormones and are associated with lower risks, including the risk of breast cancer, stroke and heart attack. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to further expound upon the differences.
References:
3. North American Menopause Society Statement on Bioidentical Hormones Therapy